2026 Regular Season · WNBA PLAYER DOSSIER
BENCH
G
Quionche Carter
Phoenix Mercury (PHX) · 12 GP (0 GS) · 6.8 MPG · Hollinger GmSc 1.1
POINTS (PPG)
1.2
12 GP (0 GS)
REBOUNDS (RPG)
0.8
Glass load
ASSISTS (APG)
0.6
0.2 TOPG
PTS+REB+AST (PRA)
2.6
Combined output
TRUE SHOOTING (TS%)
30.0%
16.7% eFG%
SHOOTING SPLITS
16.7% / 0.0%
56.2% FT · 0.0 3PM/G
STOCKS (STL / BLK)
0.4 / 0.0
Defensive disruption
HOLLINGER GMSC
1.1
6.8 MPG
Prop Hit-Rate Dossier (L5 · L10 · Season)
Over Hit Frequency vs Baseline Half-Point Line| Prop Market | Line | Season Avg | L5 Hit% | L10 Hit% | Season Hit% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points Over PTS | O 1.5 | 1.2 | 20% (1/5) | 40% (4/10) | 42% (5/12) |
| Rebounds Over REB | O 0.5 | 0.8 | 60% (3/5) | 50% (5/10) | 58% (7/12) |
| Assists Over AST | O 0.5 | 0.6 | 40% (2/5) | 40% (4/10) | 42% (5/12) |
| Pts + Reb + Ast Over PRA | O 2.5 | 2.6 | 40% (2/5) | 40% (4/10) | 42% (5/12) |
| 3-Pointers Made Over 3PM | O 0.5 | 0.0 | 0% (0/5) | 0% (0/10) | 0% (0/12) |
Situational & Recency Splits
L5 / L10 Form vs Home & Road Venue Splits| Split Window | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | PRA | 3PM | FG% | 3P% | TS% | GmSc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season Average | 12 | 6.8 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 16.7% | 0.0% | 30.0% | 1.1 |
| Last 10 Games (L10) | 10 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 13.3% | 0.0% | 29.5% | 1.1 |
| Last 5 Games (L5) | 5 | 6.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 14.3% | 0.2 |
| Home Court Splits | 4 | 8.2 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 11.1% | 0.0% | 29.0% | 1.3 |
| Road Splits | 8 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 22.2% | 0.0% | 30.9% | 0.9 |
STARTER · 33.0 MPG
Kahleah Copper
G
21.5 PPG
3.7 RPG · 1.9 APG · 56.4% TS%
STARTER · 21.2 MPG
Kelsey Plum
G
15.8 PPG
1.8 RPG · 2.8 APG · 62.3% TS%
STARTER · 33.2 MPG
Alyssa Thomas
F
14.3 PPG
7.8 RPG · 8.5 APG · 56.5% TS%
STARTER · 27.6 MPG
DeWanna Bonner
F
10.6 PPG
6.1 RPG · 1.5 APG · 52.2% TS%
ROTATION · 20.1 MPG
Jovana Nogic
G
10.4 PPG
1.1 RPG · 1.6 APG · 61.2% TS%
STARTER · 23.4 MPG
Monique Akoa Makani
G
9.4 PPG
2.1 RPG · 2.5 APG · 58.8% TS%
STARTER · 22.7 MPG
Natasha Mack
F
8.9 PPG
6.7 RPG · 1.1 APG · 64.0% TS%
ROTATION · 15.6 MPG
Shay Ciezki
G
8.5 PPG
1.5 RPG · 1.6 APG · 63.9% TS%
| Date | Opponent | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | PRA | STL | BLK | TOV | FG | 3PT | FT | GmSc | Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2 |
vs
SEA
|
W 90-67 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 1-2 | -0.5 | Box |
| Jun 27 |
@
TOR
|
W 89-80 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 2-6 | 1.7 | Box |
| Jun 24 |
@
IND
|
W 111-109 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | -0.7 | Box |
| Jun 22 |
@
IND
|
L 77-86 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0 | Box |
| Jun 20 |
vs
SEA
|
W 93-73 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.6 | Box |
| Jun 13 |
vs
LA
|
L 102-111 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | -1.4 | Box |
| Jun 11 |
@
DAL
|
L 70-85 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.3 | Box |
| Jun 9 |
@
GS
|
L 81-87 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 2.3 | Box |
| Jun 5 |
@
POR
|
W 78-72 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 2.4 | Box |
| Jun 1 |
vs
MIN
|
L 77-111 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 6.3 | Box |
| May 10 |
@
GS
|
L 79-95 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | -0.4 | Box |
| May 9 |
@
LV
|
W 99-66 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2.0 | Box |